Bańka? Jaka bańka?

Było już o Peterze Schiffie, który generalnie miał rację jeżeli chodzi o przewidzenie kryzysu. Co ja sądziłem można znaleźć w archiwum. Ale co sądzili inni ?

Wszyscy kolejni ‘główni ekonomiści z zrzeszenia pośredników nieruchomości’ to oszuści i kłamcy, kompletnie dziś skompromitowani. Chyba tylko najbardziej naiwni realtorzy im wierzą. Nawet niezależny Barry Ritholtz, popularny amerykański bloger, lubiący pokazywać się w mediach, w bańkę nie wierzył. Poniżej inne co ciekawsze cytaty:

1. Alan Reynolds, Cato Institute:

“No Housing Bubble Trouble,”Washington Times (January 8, 2005): “In short, we are asked to worry about something that has never happened for reasons still to be coherently explained. ‘Housing bubble’ worrywarts have long been hopelessly confused. It would have been financially foolhardy to listen to them in 2002. It still is.”

“Recession Fairy Tales,” Townhall (October 5, 2006): “When it comes to homes . . . many people have spent the last four years fretting that the ‘housing bubble’ might end. That is, they worried that overpriced homes might become more affordable. This is not quite as nonsensical as worrying the price of oil might fall too much, but it’s close.”

2. Kevin Hassett, American Enterprise Institute:

New York Times (July 25, 2004): “Another bubble-skeptic is Kevin Hassett, director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute and co-author of the fabled ‘Dow 36,000,’ which was published in 1999 when the Dow Jones index was around 11,000. Mr. Hassett says there is an ideological component to the belief in bubbles. Liberals, who tend to believe that government must step in to protect people from market imperfections, will likely see more of them. Conservatives, who like their markets unfettered, will see less. [EoC: What a classic line. Liberals win again, conservatives lose again—same old, same old.]

“Mr. Hassett of the conservative American Enterprise Institute thinks housing prices will be pretty much O.K. He acknowledges there might be some bubble dynamics at play in some regions. But he argues that for the most part people are paying more for homes because their incomes are higher and interest rates are lower, reducing the cost to own a home.

“Mr. Hassett expects that rising interest rates would raise this cost and home prices would then decline proportionately. But he sees no reason to expect a catastrophic decline. ‘I don’t think a catastrophe is very likely,’ he says.

3. James K. Glassman, American Enterprise Institute:

“Housing Bubble?,” Capitalism Magzine (May 24, 2005): “[W]hile such signs of speculation are troubling, there is little solid evidence that a real estate bubble is puffing up.

“Even in places where prices are soaring, worries of a bubble could be overblown because higher prices appear grounded in good old fundamentals.”

4. Jude Wanniski, journalist/supply-sider:

“There is No Housing Bubble!!,” The Conservative Voice (August 13, 2005).

5. Jerry Bowyer, author of The Bush Boom:

“Hate to Burst Your (Housing) Bubble: But there isn’t one,” National Review (July 5, 2006).

6. Nicolas P. Restinas, director, Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies:

“More Than a Bubble Keeps Housing Prices Sky-High,” LA Times (May 20, 2004).

7. Jim Cramer, host of CNBC’s “Mad Money”:

“House Beautiful,” New York Magazine (December 8, 2003): “Housing bubble? What housing bubble? The signs are in place for a further run-up in real estate. Breathe easy, mortgage holders. There’s still no place like home.”

8. Christopher Flanagan, head of ABS research, J.P. Morgan:

“Housing Outlook,” J.P. Morgan Research, June 17, 2005 (no link): “[B]ased on what we know and see in terms of employment and interest rates, it is extremely difficult to see how five years from now we could be looking back and observing a historical 5-year growth rate of, say, less than 5%. That should be more than adequate to support the continued good credit performance of sub-prime mortgage pools.

“It is important to understand — we can contemplate home price growth rates declining, albeit modestly, but we do NOT envision home prices declining!

9. Neil Barsky, Alson Capital Partners, LLC:

“What Housing Bubble?,” Wall Street Journal (July 28, 2005): “There is no housing bubble in this country. Our strong housing market is a function of myriad factors with real economic underpinnings: low interest rates, local job growth, the emotional attachment one has for one’s home, one’s view of one’s future earning- power, and parental contributions, all have done their part to contribute to rising home prices.

“What we do have is a serious housing shortage and housing affordability crisis.”

10. Chris Mayer, professor of real estate, Columbia Business School, and Todd Sinai, professor of real estate, Wharton School:

“Bubble Trouble? Not Likely,” Wall Street Journal (September 19, 2005): “For the past several years, Chicken Littles have squawked that the sky — or the ceiling — is about to fall on the housing market. And it’s tempting to believe them.

“Yet basic economic logic suggests that this apparent evidence of a bubble is anything but. Even in the highest-price cities, housing is, at most, slightly more expensive than average.”

11. Jonathan McCarthy, senior economist, New York Fed, and Richard W. Peach, vice president, New York Fed:

“Are Home Prices the Next Bubble?,” FRBNY Economic Policy Review (December 2004): “Home prices have been rising strongly since the mid-1990s, prompting concerns that a bubble exists in this asset class and that home prices are vulnerable to a collapse that could harm the U.S. economy.

“A close analysis of the U.S. housing market in recent years, however, finds little basis for such concerns. The marked upturn in home prices is largely attributable to strong market fundamentals: Home prices have essentially moved in line with increases in family income and declines in nominal mortgage interest rates.”

12. David Malpass, chief economist, Bear Stearns:

“So This is a Weak Economy?,” Wall Street Journal (June 28, 2005): “[T]he litany against the U.S. economy is so ingrained and familiar that few disputed this spring’s ‘slowdown.’ When strong data on income, employment, consumption and profits showed 3.5% first-quarter GDP growth and a continuation into the second quarter, the headlines shifted to other attacks — adjustable-rate mortgages, a housing ‘bubble,’ the distribution of income — rather than revising the slowdown story.”

13. Steve Forbes, CEO, Forbes, Inc.:

Global Leaders Speakers Series (November 10, 2005): “[Forbes] maintained that there was no ‘housing bubble’ in the U.S. but there was an ‘oil bubble’ driven by speculators.”

14. Brian S. Wesbury, chief investment strategist, Claymore Advisors:

“Mr. Greenspan’s Cappuccino,” Wall Street Journal (May 31, 2005): “These nattering nabobs expect a housing collapse to take down the U.S. economy. But excessive pessimism is unwarranted: Fears of a housing bubble are overblown.”

15. Noel Sheppard, economist, Business & Media Institute:

“Media Myths: The Housing Bubble is Bursting,”Business & Media Institute (Nov. 30, 2005): “The increase in real estate values the past five years has not resembled the rapid rise typically seen in a bubble.”

16. Carl Steidtmann, chief economist, Deloitte Research:

“The Housing Bubble Myth,” Economist’s Corner (July 2005): “When you strip away all of the white noise around a housing bubble, what you find is a robust market for housing that is undergoing several profound changes all of which manifest themselves in higher home price indexes, none of which adds up to a housing price bubble.”

17. John K. McIlwain, senior resident fellow for housing, Urban Land Institute:

“No Housing Bubble to Pop,” Washington Post (March 2, 2005): “[T]he housing markets will cool as interest rates rise and as affordability declines, but they won’t crash. Most markets will flatten for a while or increase at lower, more historical, rates. A few may decline for a year or two. But we won’t have a crash.”

18. Margaret Hwang Smith, professor of economics, Pomona College, and Gary Smith, professor of economics, Pomona College:

“Bubble, Bubble, Where’s the Housing Bubble?,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2006): “Our evidence indicates that, even though prices have risen rapidly and some buyers have unrealistic expectations of continuing price increases, the bubble is not, in fact, a bubble in most of these areas in that, under a variety of plausible assumptions, buying a house at current market prices still appears to be an attractive long-term investment.”

19. Charles Himmelberg, economist, New York Fed (with Columbia professor Chris Mayer and Wharton professor Todd Sinai—see #10, above):

“Assessing High House Prices: Bubbles, Fundamentals, and Misperceptions,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports (September 2005): “As of the end of 2004, our analysis reveals little evidence of a housing bubble. In high appreciation markets like San Francisco, Boston, and New York, current housing prices are not cheap, but our calculations do not reveal large price increases in excess of fundamentals.”

20. Jim Jubak, investing columnist, MSN Money:

Why There is No Housing Bubble,” MSN Money (June 10, 2005): “Housing bubble? What housing bubble? With the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond yielding below 4% and 30-year mortgages available at 5.1%, there isn’t a housing bubble.”

21. James F. Smith, director, Center for Business Forecasting:

“There is No Housing Bubble in the USA: Housing Activity Will Remain At High Levels in 2005 and Beyond,” Business Economics (April 2005): “There is no evidence of a housing ‘bubble’ in the United States and housing demand should stay strong for years to come.”

22. Kathryn Jean Lopez, editor, National Review Online:

“Don’t be Myth-Understood,” National Review (December 21, 2005): “[T]he so-called housing bubble has yet to pop, and likely won’t as long as home ownership remains a tax-advantaged event. Even the New York Times — no parrot of White House talking points — has had to admit that the economy is ‘booming.'”

23. Samuel Lieber, president, Alpine Woods Capital Investors:

“Housing Bubble? The Market Won’t Pop, Experts Predict,” Wall Street Journal (April 12, 2006): “We don’t see a bubble. Historically, home prices just don’t go down nationwide unless we are in a significant recession. The last time home prices fell nationwide was in 1990. It’s employment that really counts. The underlying fundamentals of real estate are still very positive. Job creation and household formation drive housing.”

24. Mark Vitner, senior economist, Wachovia:

“There is No Housing Bubble, Says Senior Economist,” The Virginia-Pilot (January 19, 2006): “‘Everybody is looking for evidence of a housing bubble,’ [Vitner] said. ‘There is not a housing bubble. The supply had not kept up with demand.'”

25. George Karvel, professor of real estate, St. Thomas University:
“Housing bubble?,” Minneapolis Star Tribune, October 4, 2005 (via LEXIS): “‘There’s no housing bubble,’ said George Karvel, a professor of real estate at the University of St. Thomas. ‘This is a media-induced frenzy. If I wanted to say there is a housing bubble, I’d have Time and Money magazine camped on my door. They’ve called, and I’ve told them there’s no bubble. Panic sells.”

“There is absolutely nothing in any market in the country to indicate there’d be any kind of collapse in housing prices,’ he said.”

Źródło: Economics of Contempt

Share This Post

2 thoughts on “Bańka? Jaka bańka?

  1. Jeszcze Arthur Laffer, Ben Stein, Mike Norman.
    Moze warto zrobic wpis z lista osob, ktore mialy racje.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *